By

December 6, 2017

Jira’s not bad. So why are so many teams looking at alternatives like Manuscript?

Over the past several years, everybody who cares about tech has become acutely aware that software really  — it has a huge impact, both positive and (potentially) negative. But while our perspective on tech has changed, a lot of the tools we use haven’t kept up.

We think that’s the reason why, when we launched Manuscript, we heard from so many people with, uh… opinions about Jira who told us they were hungry for another option. Don’t get us wrong — the people who make Jira are very nice folks, and very smart, but when there’s a constant stream of complaints, there’s got to be a deeper cause.

What people mean when they complain about Jira isn’t just about the tool itself—it’s about how Jira makes them feel when trying to work as a team.

A jack-of-all-trades platform is always going to leave at least some members of a team exasperated. It’s virtually impossible for the same tool to be useful for both lawyers reviewing documents and for developers crafting great software. Worse, that open-ended design makes it all too easy to focus on process over products, leaving everybody on the team sitting through endless meetings or filling out pointless forms instead of doing their actual work.

As you might guess, we think there’s a better way to do things.

We think you’ll be excited to try Manuscript for your next software project, or even just for your next team sprint. Here’s why:

The truth is, the process of changing culture in a development team takes time. Evolving how we think of creating technology doesn’t happen overnight.

So, for your next project, get started with Manuscript for free. See what your team can do when they’re freed up to focus on their most ambitious goals.